“United Future” Policies, and Autism

United Future New Zealand

Image via Wikipedia

I’ve done a lot of hunting through the policies of the Parties running in the upcoming New Zealand General Election; trying to find their express views on disability, particularly as they impact on autism families. The difficulty of finding their express views, has surprised and disappointed me. I realise it is a couple of months out from the election – and certain Parties are in turmoil due to changes in leadership for instance – but it should be easier than it has been to figure out (at the very least their existing) views relevant to disability.

So it is noteworthy that United Future is one of the few parties that have made it easy to access these policies. This gives a favourable impression of how much they have considered, and taken seriously, the issues surrounding disability.

There are a number of places in United Future’s policies where they directly address disability concerns, including their Disability Policy, Special Education policy, and Children with Disabilities Policy. I’m going to go through their key points relevant to the autism community.

I’ll begin by pointing out that United Future – much like the Green Party – is concerned about the gap between existing disability policy and actual practice.

I was interested to see that United Future wants to “establish Community-based advocacy services to ensure that every disabled person and their family have a case manager who ensures that clients are given every support they are entitled to and want.” Our family rather accidentally ended up with someone performing this function; a social worker who was proactive in getting various organisations to do what they were meant to be doing for us without the delay and fuss, and who helped to co-ordinate the bewildering number of people and groups we were interacting with. Our family reached the point where we no longer needed his services (and in fact found his a tad too intrusive), but it was valuable to have his expertise, dedication and support in this capacity, and I know many other families have struggled without someone like this in place. I think formalizing such a position for each family, is a worthy idea.

I found it particularly insightful when they said they would “establish advocacy services so that parents have more energy to give to parenting rather than chasing entitlements.” Well said.

In the meantime, in the absence of such helpful advocacy services, United Future wants to streamline applications for assistance to the numerous organisations that frequently interact with families like ours (health, education, income support, etc).

Another great idea proposed by United Future, is “the development of “family governance groups” to oversee life-long care arrangements for individuals with disabilities.” This is an issue that worries families like ours, a lot. It is comforting, to say the least, to see recognition of such concerns. I would be interested to see the details of such a suggestion (I was unable to find those details).

Like the Green Party, United Future is also keen to see a Disability Commission set up.

Considering our own family’s struggles with accessing and then utilising carer hours, I was interested to see their policy state that “more accountability is needed to track where the money from unfilled carer hours goes and is spent.” I have heard (and experienced) some very dodgy tales about the allocation of carer hours, so I’d be keen to see this scrutiny occur. Also related to such service providers, it was good to see the policy state that “the sector needs to be client-driven not provider-driven. Better collaboration between what clients want and what services are available will require a change in funding and contracting. Where possible the client should determine the contract.

United Future wants to see more acknowledgment and support for the carers of those with disabilities, including the introduction of a “Caregivers Allowance” and making respite care widely available.

Again, like the Green Party, United Future wants to see disability training become a compulsory part of teacher training. They want to increase ORS funding (small error that through-out their policy they use the out-dated acronym of ORRS). They note that ORS is only given to 1% of students, but that 1 in 5 students have disabilities of some sort. United Future wants to see a shuffling of the allocation of funds within the education sector, to address some wide-spread issues of special needs money not going where it is most needed (details are numerous, and can be found here), and wants to “promote an increase of funding for early identification of children with special needs and disabilities with targeted systematic, intensive and high quality interventions.

In my further research, I have found that United Future is very aware of the disparity between disability care (for people such as those with autism), and care for disability caused by accidents as covered by ACC; that ACC is a very generous scheme but does not extend to those born with their condition, even though their lives may be ultimately affected in the exact same ways as those who arrive at their problems via “accident.” This concern is reflected in their policy: They would like to “establish a health levy (or National Insurance Scheme) to provide a designated fund to address the disparity between trauma-based (ACC) and non-trauma based impairment.

There are many others aspects of United Future’s policies that will also variously impact on autism families, but I think I’ve managed to capture the main areas. I encourage you to click-through to their main website if you want to investigate further. (They have an unfortunately worded banner up on that main page, that says “Support the Voice of Mainstrean New Zealand”, and I’ve seen commentators attack then for this wording – claiming it isolates and marginalises us non “mainstream” families – but it’s clear from United Future’s own policies that that really is reading too much into the banner’s wording.)

I shall end with my standard disclaimer for these posts:

Please note, I’m not endorsing voting for United Future, and I am not a member of United Future, or indeed any other political party. No one has asked me, or paid me, to write these posts. If I become aware of United Future introducing any major changes to their policy relevant to autism pre the election, I will add it as a dated edit under this paragraph. I welcome feedback from any and all parts of the political spectrum to this and the other Election 2011 posts I shall be doing, which will all be filed under the category “NZ Elections 2011; Autism.”

Gallery | This entry was posted in NZ Elections 2011; Autism and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to “United Future” Policies, and Autism

  1. Foundations says:

    Thats good and interesting, thanks.
    Its not just autism families thats important but autism singles have a real difficult time too (incl finding companionship/love).

    Ever since i found out that the social assistance bill/act (work testing) was put in by the Greens woman who is minsiter of “social development” i don’t trust the Greens anymore. Prior to that I had someone tell me that Greens had some social credit policies?

    Autism is part and parcel of globalism and hyperindividualism and consumerism/commercialism/corporativism, etc.

    Personally I thought Future NZ (who united with United to form United Future NZ) were too right-wing, and don’t like the fact that they coalition with National etc, but your post gives some good info/views on their policies.
    Future NZ are at least a christian party which maybe one reason why they have disability etc policies. (God has been the only one or thing to improve my condition in last 3 years.)

    There is definately a lack of support for people with certain disabilities (like myself).

    Have you tried autismnz and christian fellowship for disabled and some others i’d have to look up in my notes?

    My friend saidthat Normandale School’s small class sizes etc was one think that was good for their autisic child.

    Do you actually think that autism is a “born with” thing like you wrote or is caused or at least brought out by environment? When I went for ACC independence allowance renewal the doctor concluded i was pdd/apsergers and ACC claims that that is not caused by (sexual) abuse/trauma etc (and they don’t recognise things like mercury fillings).

    GBWU and est wishes for your family, and my respect and wish you well for whoever you vote whether UF or whoever since you at least are an informed voter which unfortunately majority of nzrs aren’t.


    • Thanks for your comment Sean.

      I’ve reached the point with my family that we have excellent support through my son’s special needs school, so we’re not in as much need as many other families are for charity and external (ie, outside of school) government support, though I know transitioning out of school will change that. Prior to entering school we were in great need of that extra assistance and very much struggled to access it; even once we got it hanging on to it was stressful and it was never enough.

      And yes, it appears that my son was always autistic. There are various known causes of autism, that are environmental, but only within the womb (ie pre-birth), such as thalidomide use or a rubella infection during pregnancy. There are no known environmental causes post birth; which doesn’t mean there aren’t some. There are known genetic causes too, such as fragile X syndrome. You need to keep in mind too that there are a variety of autisms, and a variety of on-set times, severity, etc. Just to complicate things further, what autism is will be redefined in 2013 with the new DSM. My son’s autism is still autism under either manual, and his autism is what is sometimes called “classic autism.” However he didn’t regress; he developed very differently and very delayed (with a myriad of other issues of course). Autism is a complex subject, no doubt about that!

      Best wishes to you and your family too.

Share your thoughts:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s